Rachel Maddow wearing glasses and looking at the camera: MSNBC anchor Rachel Maddow on October 2, 2019. Nathan Congleton/NBCU Photo Bank/NBCUniversal via Getty Images


© Nathan Congleton/NBCU Picture Financial institution/NBCUniversal by using Getty Photographs
MSNBC anchor Rachel Maddow on October 2, 2019. Nathan Congleton/NBCU Photo Financial institution/NBCUniversal via Getty Visuals

  • A decide purchased significantly-suitable outlet OAN’s father or mother enterprise to pay back $250,000 in Rachel Maddow and MSNBC’s authorized fees.
  • Herring Networks in 2019 sued MSNBC and Maddow for defamation following the anchor said OAN was “paid out Russian propaganda.”
  • A judge determined against Herring Networks, ruling there was “no set of information that could aid a declare for defamation.”
  • Pay a visit to the Organization portion of Insider for additional stories.

A California judge requested Herring Networks, the dad or mum business of the far-proper cable news outlet A single The usa News, to pay $250,000 in legal costs to Rachel Maddow and MSNBC’s following its failed defamation match versus them in 2019, according to a report from Regulation&Criminal offense.

&#13

In July 2019, Herring Networks submitted a defamation match in a San Diego court docket in opposition to Maddow, Comcast, MSNBC, and NBCUniversal Media, arguing the network’s primetime anchor created defamatory claims about OAN throughout a broadcast in which Maddow reported that OAN “pretty much is compensated Russian propaganda.” 

Herring sued MSNBC and Maddow for $10 million soon after she designed the opinions all through a July 22, 2019, broadcast of “The Rachel Maddow Clearly show.” Her claims adopted a report from The Everyday Beast that claimed an personnel of the pro-Trump network also worked for the Russian-owned Sputnik Information, as The Related Push earlier claimed.

Study extra: Snapchat’s teenage buyers are finding sextorted. Previous staff members say the business is also slow to support.

“Their on-air US politics reporter is paid out by the Russian authorities to deliver propaganda for that authorities,” Maddow explained at the time.

Attorneys for MSNBC and Maddow countersued under California’s Anti-Strategic Lawsuits Versus General public Participation statute, which permits for defendants to file to strike a motion on the basis that “any act . . . in furtherance of the person’s correct of petition or cost-free speech less than the United States Constitution or the California Constitution in link with a community challenge.”

US District Judge Cynthia Bashant final calendar year dismissed Herring Networks lawsuits with prejudice, selecting there ended up “no established of points that could support a claim for defamation dependent on Maddow’s statement,” according to the report.

Under the anti-SLAPP legislation, defendants who successfully have their fit tossed out are entitled to have at the very least a part of their authorized fees utilized for their defense include by the social gathering that introduced the dismissed suit.

Herring Networks was purchased to pay Maddow and MSNBC’s authorized expenses for about 363 hrs of work by attorneys that totaled $247,667.50, in accordance to the report. They were also awarded an extra $10,724 for hrs that had been billed by paralegals, Law&Criminal offense described.

Charles Herring, the president of Herring Networks, advised Legislation&Crime in a statement that it was in the procedure of attractive the ruling.

“We’re delighted that the service fees were being decreased by nearly a third by the court docket,” he advised the outlet. “The circumstance is presently underneath appeal and we are really confident that we are going to receive a favorable and just ruling in the US Court docket of Appeals for the 9th Circuit.”

Proceed Examining