June 1, 2023


Buy Law now

Scots regulation approved in mesothelioma assert pursued in England versus ICI

4 min read

Dushal Mehta, with Counsel John-Paul Swoboda and Spencer Turner from 12 Kings’ Bench Walk, has received an essential component of an uncommon mesothelioma claim on behalf of the widow of a gentleman exposed to asbestos in Scotland in the 1970s.

Charmaine Haggerty provides a claim for damages in opposition to Imperial Chemical Industries Ltd (ICI) based mostly in Ardeer (Stevenston), Scotland. She alleges that her late spouse was uncovered to asbestos although he labored at this manufacturing facility amongst 1973/74 and 1978/79. The factory was made use of to manufacture explosives and it is alleged that even though Mr Haggerty labored for the corporation he was necessary to cope with asbestos without having adequate warning or defense.  This is the only alleged exposure to asbestos and it is claimed that this exposure brought on Mr Haggerty’s analysis and unfortunate demise because of to mesothelioma.

The Defendant disputes liability and proceedings have been issued in the High Court docket in London. The preliminary situation which the Court docket was asked to decide was no matter whether the Claimant could seek to apply Scots law to the claim even with the claim being brought in England. The circumstance was mentioned for a 1 working day demo in January 2021 to determine this situation.

If Scots law was located to apply, the Claimant could provide a claim for ‘loss of society’ below area 4 of the Damages (Scotland) Act 2011, which experienced the opportunity to substantially enhance the price of her claim.  It is perfectly regarded that a loss of culture award can’t be created beneath English legislation and that damages awarded in mesothelioma cases are usually better beneath Scots regulation as opposed to English law generally due to the way in which the loss of society award is assessed and quantified. Less than English law Claimants are restricted to a statutory bereavement award. In addition, other kin not able to declare in English legislation would also be ready to sign up for the action if Scots regulation utilized.

The circumstance concerned the frequent-legislation double actionability rule and regardless of whether the ‘flexible exception’ to the rule could apply. The definition of the double actionability rule in English law is:

“As a standard rule, in buy to observed a accommodate in England for a erroneous alleged to have been fully commited overseas, two disorders ought to be fulfilled. 1st, the incorrect ought to be of these kinds of a character that it would have been actionable if fully commited in England. Secondly, the act have to not have been justifiable by the regulation of the location of where by it was completed.” Phillips v Eyre (1870) L.R. 6 Q.B.

Though the rule was meant to make sure that a human being ought to not be liable for a thing which is lawful in the location that it is performed and next, to present that a individual who is offered safety by the regulations of one particular region is protected towards authorized proceedings in other nations, it clearly runs parallel with the suitable of the courts to come across ‘flexible exception’, illustrated in Boys v Chaplin [1971] A.C. 356:

Boys arose out of a highway visitors accident in Malta. The Claimant and the Defendant were being each commonly resident in England but at the time of the incident have been stationed in Malta as users of the armed forces. Maltese regulation furnished that typical damages could not be recovered for discomfort, suffering and reduction of amenity. The dilemma for the Residence of Lords was whether or not the Claimant could get better the normal damages in his claim brought in England.

The Property of Lords identified that, even though the Claimant’s declare would are unsuccessful less than the general rule of double actionability, there were being crystal clear and satisfactory grounds on which to apply the versatile exception. Lord Wilberforce specifically emphasised the fact that the events have been equally ordinarily resident in England and that no coverage or interest of Malta would be adversely affected by the application of an English rule in a assert brought by one English celebration from a further.

The issues with the exception is that the court docket in Boys did not present a set of firm suggestions for analyzing when the exception could be invoked.

On behalf of Mrs Haggerty, we argued the exception rule in this claim, refuted by the Defendant, the insurance company of the previous ICI. The situation was scheduled for a preliminary listening to in the Large Court to figure out the applicable regulation. On the other hand, shortly just before the listening to, the Defendant conceded that Scots legislation should implement to the difficulty of liability and quantum in the assert.

The assert is now set down for a demo later this year to determine whether or not Mrs Haggerty should really be awarded damages for her late husband’s demise thanks to mesothelioma and if she succeeds then the stage of damages that she and other relatives customers really should be awarded under Scots regulation.

Speak to us

For even further facts about mesothelioma payment statements, make sure you phone Dushal Mehta on 020 7861 4033 or e mail [email protected].


All enquiries are totally free of charge and we will look into all funding possibilities for you which include no win, no cost.


txapeldunegarri.com | Newsphere by AF themes.