Dwelling prosecutors and the previous president’s protection team are putting forward their arguments about Trump’s position in the Jan. 6 riot at the U.S. Capitol and on the legality of even holding a trial. They’re also debating the First Modification and a blunt assessment by Democrats that the riot posed a threat to the presidential line of succession.

Takeaways from the arguments of both equally sides:

‘SINGULARLY RESPONSIBLE’

Who’s responsible for the riot? Democrats say you can find only a single answer, and it’s Trump.

The Democrats contend that Trump was “singularly liable” for the Jan. 6 assault by “creating a powder keg, hanging a match, and then looking for particular advantage from the ensuing havoc.” They say it’s “impossible” to visualize the riot unfolding as it did without the need of Trump’s encouragement, and they even cite as guidance a fellow Republican, Rep. Liz Cheney of Wyoming, who explained fundamentally the exact same detail.

Trump’s legal professionals, by distinction, propose he are unable to be dependable for the reason that he never ever incited any person to “engage in harmful behavior.” They concede there was an illegal breach of the Capitol that resulted in fatalities and injuries. But they say the persons who are “responsible” — the ones who entered the constructing and vandalized it — are being investigated and prosecuted.

First Amendment FAULT LINE

Trump’s legal professionals don’t dispute that he explained to supporters to “fight like hell” prior to the Capitol siege. But the defense says that Trump, like any citizen, is secured by the Initially Modification to “express his belief that the election success were being suspect.” He experienced an viewpoint that he was entitled to express, they say, and if the Initially Modification only shielded common speech, it’d be “no defense at all.”

Residence Democrats really don’t see it that way. For 1 matter, they say the Very first Modification is meant to safeguard personal citizens from the federal government, not to allow for federal government officers to abuse their power. And whilst a non-public citizen may well have a ideal to advocate for totalitarianism or the overthrow of the government, “no a single would significantly suggest” that a president who adopted those people same positions need to be immune from impeachment.

LINE OF SUCCESSION

The impeachment administrators condition that loyalists egged on by Trump directly endangered the protection of lawmakers who fled the Home and the Senate as the rioters poured in.

Amongst those people impacted were being the government’s most senior leaders.

Those in the line of succession for the presidency just after Trump — then-Vice President Mike Pence, Dwelling Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Professional Tempore Chuck Grassley — had been all in the Capitol and forced to flee for security. Trump’s carry out not only “endangered the existence of every single solitary Member of Congress,” the Democrats wrote, but also “jeopardized the tranquil transition of energy and line of succession.”

The quick particulars chilling threats to Pence and Pelosi as rioters ransacked the developing and “specifically hunted” them. According to the doc, which cites media shops and video clips, insurrectionists shouted, “Hang Mike Pence!” and termed him a traitor mainly because he’d indicated he would not obstacle the electoral depend, as Trump wished. One particular particular person is alleged to have reported that Pelosi would have been “torn into tiny pieces” experienced she been identified.

The Democrats also explain the terror felt by lawmakers and staffers through the siege. “Some Users called liked types for fear that they would not survive the assault by President Trump’s insurrectionist mob,” the impeachment professionals wrote.

DENY, DENY, DENY

That is the message from Trump’s defense group, which made use of the phrase “denied” or “denies” a whopping 29 situations in its 14-web page transient.

Trump’s team denies that the impeachment demo can be held due to the fact he is no extended in office environment. They deny that he incited his supporters to violence. And they deny he did something wrong on Jan. 6, or the months major up to the riot, when he whipped his supporters into a frenzy by convincing them, irrespective of mind-boggling evidence to the opposite, that the election experienced been stolen from him.

When Trump explained to the crowd, “If you really don’t struggle like hell, you’re not going to have a place any longer,” he was basically urgent the “need to combat for election security in common,” Trump’s attorneys claim. He was not trying to interfere with the counting of electoral votes, even even though he had demanded that Pence do just that.

“It is denied that President Trump ever endangered the safety of the United States and its establishments of Authorities,” they wrote. “It is denied he threatened the integrity of the democratic program, interfered with the tranquil changeover of energy, and imperiled a coequal branch Federal government.”

Instead, they say, he “executed admirably in his role as president, at all situations executing what he believed was in the very best pursuits of the American people.”

There was no common fraud in the election, as has been confirmed by a selection of election officers across the state and by previous Legal professional Typical William Barr. Almost all the authorized challenges to the election put forth by Trump and his allies were dismissed.

Record LESSON

The two sides are at odds about whether a demo is permissible now that Trump has still left office — and the seemingly arcane argument could be important to his acquittal.

Trump’s lawyers say the case is moot considering that he is no more time in the White House and the Senate therefore isn’t going to have jurisdiction to test him in an impeachment scenario. Numerous Senate Republicans concur, and 45 of them voted on that basis to finish the demo prior to it started. A two-thirds vote of the Senate would be required for Trump’s conviction.

It is genuine that no president has confronted impeachment proceedings after leaving workplace, but Household managers say you will find enough precedent. They cite the case of previous Secretary of War William Belknap, who resigned in 1876 just several hours just before he was impeached in excess of a kickback scheme. The Household impeached him anyway, and the Senate then tried out him, even though he was in the long run acquitted. Democrats also take note that Trump was impeached by the Household when he was nevertheless president.

The framers of the Structure intended for the impeachment electric power to sanction latest or previous officials for functions committed while in workplace — with no “January exception,” Democrats wrote. Not only that, they say, the Constitution explicitly will allow the Senate to disqualify from long run workplace a former official it convicts.

That risk, they counsel, makes the circumstance versus Trump — who could mount another White House operate in 2024 — everything but moot.